Hello, my partner! Let's explore the mining machine together!

[email protected]

economic small bluestone system sand production line price in birmingham

introduction to economic systems | boundless business

introduction to economic systems | boundless business

An economic system is the combination of the various agencies and entities that provide the economic structure that defines the social community. These agencies are joined by lines of trade and exchange goods. Many different objectives may be seen as desirable for an economy, like efficiency, growth, liberty, and equality. An economic system may involve production, allocation of economic inputs, distribution of economic outputs, landlords and land availability, households (earnings and expenditure consumption of goods and services in an economy), financial institutions, firms, and the government.

In theory, a communist economy is one in which the government owns all or most enterprises. Central planning by the government dictates which goods or services are produced, how they are produced, and who will receive them. In practice, pure communism is practically nonexistent today, and only a few countries (notably North Korea and Cuba) operate under rigid, centrally planned economic systems.

Under socialism, industries that provide essential services, such as utilities, banking, and health care, may be government owned. Other businesses are owned privately. Central planning allocates the goods and services produced by government-run industries and tries to ensure that the resulting wealth is distributed equally. In contrast, privately owned companies are operated for the purpose of making a profit for their owners. In general, workers in socialist economies work fewer hours, have longer vacations, and receive more health, education, and child-care benefits than do workers in capitalist economies. To offset the high cost of public services, taxes are generally steep. Examples of socialist countries include Sweden and France.

In a free market, competition dictates how goods and services will be allocated. Business is conducted with only limited government involvement. The economies of the United States and other countries, such as Japan, are based on capitalism.

Capitalist systems range from laissez-faire, with minimal government regulation and state enterprise, to regulated and social market systems, with the stated aim of ensuring social justice and a more equitable distribution of wealth or ameliorating market failures.

World map showing communist states: Formerly titled socialist states, led by communists (whether that be in title or in fact), are represented in orange, currently titled socialist states are represented in red. It is of heavy dispute whether there are any actual socialist or genuinely communist led states in the world today.

In a market characterized by perfect competition, price is determined through the mechanisms of supply and demand. Prices are influenced both by the supply of products from sellers and by the demand for products by buyers.

The quantity of a product that people are willing to buy depends on its price. Youre typically willing to buy less of a product when prices rise and more of a product when prices fall. Generally speaking, we find products more attractive at lower prices, and we buy more at lower prices because our income goes further. Using this logic, we can construct a demand curve that shows the quantity of a product that will be demanded at different prices.

The red curve in the diagram represents the daily price and quantity of apples sold by farmers at a local market. Note that as the price of apples goes down, buyers demand goes up. Thus, if a pound of apples sells for $0.80, buyers will be willing to purchase only 1,500 pounds per day. But if apples cost only $0.60 a pound, buyers will be willing to purchase 2,000 pounds. At $0.40 a pound, buyers will be willing to purchase 2,500 pounds.

The quantity of a product that a business is willing to sell depends on its price. Businesses are more willing to sell a product when the price rises and less willing to sell it when prices fall. This fact makes sense: Businesses are set up to make profits, and there are larger profits to be made when prices are high. Now, we can construct a supply curve that shows the quantity of apples that farmers would be willing to sell at different prices, regardless of demand.

We do this by plotting both the supply curve and the demand curve on one graph. The point at which the two curves intersect is the equilibrium price. At this point, buyers demand for apples and sellers supply of apples is in equilibrium.

The supply and demand curves intersect at the price of $0.60 and quantity of 2,000 pounds. Thus, $0.60 is the equilibrium price: At this price, the quantity of apples demanded by buyers equals the quantity of apples that farmers are willing to supply.

If a farmer tries to charge more than $0.60 for a pound of apples, he wont sell very many, and his profits will go down. If, on the other hand, a farmer tries to charge less than the equilibrium price of $0.60 a pound, he will sell more apples but his profit per pound will be less than at the equilibrium price.

But we must be aware that this is a very simplistic example. Things are much more complex in the real world. For one thing, markets rarely operate without outside influences. Circumstances also have a habit of changing.

What would happen, for example, if income rose and buyers were willing to pay more for apples? The demand curve would change, resulting in an increase in equilibrium price. This outcome makes intuitive sense: As demand increases, prices will go up. What would happen if apple crops were larger than expected because of favorable weather conditions? Farmers might be willing to sell apples at lower prices. If so, the supply curve would shift, resulting in another change in equilibrium price: The increase in supply would bring down prices.

The model is commonly applied to wages, in the market for labor. The typical roles of supplier and demander are reversed. The suppliers are individuals, who try to sell their labor for the highest price. The demanders of labor are businesses, which try to buy the type of labor they need at the lowest price. The equilibrium price for a certain type of labor is the wage rate.

Economists can measure the performance of an economy by looking at gross domestic product (GDP), a widely used measure of total output. GDP is defined as the market value of all goods and services produced by the economy in a given year. In the United States, it is calculated by the Department of Commerce. GDP includes only those goods and services produced domestically; goods produced outside the country are excluded. GDP also includes only those goods and services that are produced for the final user; intermediate products are excluded. For example, the silicon chip that goes into a computer (an intermediate product) would not count, even though the finished computer would.

By itself, GDP doesnt necessarily tell us much about the state of the economy, but change in GDP does. If GDP (after adjusting for inflation) goes up, the economy is growing; if it goes down, the economy is contracting.

Growth is usually calculated in real terms, i.e. inflation-adjusted terms, in order to net out the effect of inflation on the price of the goods and services produced. In economics, economic growth or economic growth theory typically refers to growth of potential output, i.e., production at full employment, which is caused by growth in aggregate demand or observed output.

Economic growth is measured as a percentage change in the GDP or Gross National Product (GNP). These two measures, which are calculated in slightly different ways, total the amounts paid for the goods and services that a country produced.

As an example of measuring economic growth, a country that creates $9,000,000,000 in goods and services in 2010 and then creates $9,090,000,000 in 2011 has a nominal economic growth rate of 1% for 2011.

A single currency may be quoted to compare per capita economic growth among several countries. This requires converting the value of currencies of various countries into a selected currency, for example U.S. dollars. One way to do this conversion is to rely on exchange rates among the currencies, for example how many Mexican pesos buy a single U.S. dollar? Another approach is to use the purchasing power parity method. This method is based on how much consumers must pay for the same basket of goods in each country.

Inflation or deflation can make it difficult to measure economic growth. For example, if GDP goes up in a country by 1% in a year, economists must ask if this was due solely to rising prices (inflation) or if it was because more goods and services were produced and saved.

To express real growth rather than changes in prices for the same goods, statistics on economic growth are often adjusted for inflation or deflation. For example, a table may show changes in GDP in the period 1990 to 2000, as expressed in 1990 U.S. dollars. This means that the U.S. dollar with the purchasing power it had in the U.S. in 1990 is the only currency being used for the comparison. The table might mention that the figures are inflation-adjusted, or real. If no adjustment was made for inflation, the table might make no mention of inflation-adjustment, or might mention that the prices are nominal.

price controls are not the answer to expensive drugs

price controls are not the answer to expensive drugs

The isolated measures of price fixing fail to attain the ends sought. In fact, they produce effects contrary to those aimed at by the government. If the government, in order to eliminate these inexorable and unwelcome consequences, pursues its course further and further, it finally transforms the system of capitalism and free enterprise into socialism.

Despite their abysmal track record, government solutions are back in vogue. Ostensibly, governments scale, leverage, and freedom from profit will unlock potential health care savings that are beyond the reach of the private sector.

At their most extreme, reforms such as Medicare for all call for a complete government takeover of the health care system. Proponents of single payer reforms claim that only a complete government takeover of the health care sector can eliminate the health care sectors inefficiencies and ensure 100 percent patient coverage.

Of course, if governments scale and freedom from having to earn a profit was so effective, then why does FedEx and UPS consistently outperform the U.S. Postal Service? Or, why is Amtrak always teetering on the brink of insolvency? In the health care space, if scale and the freedom from having to pay a profit is so important, why is the health care provided by the Veterans Administration and the Indian Health Service so abysmal?

Heightening these concerns, 80 percent of primary care doctors will accept new patients that are covered by private insurance, but only 72 percent will accept new Medicare patients and 45 percent new Medicaid patients. This lower acceptance rate is linked to Medicares and Medicaids uneconomical reimbursement levels. And, herein lies the rub.

Whether it is state Medicaid programs, the federal Veteran Affairs health system, or nationalized health systems in other countries, government-run health care creates savings by restricting access and reducing the quality of care. It is folly to believe that government will be able to provide high quality health care services at a reasonable cost.

Others preach that, instead of a complete government takeover of the health care system, the best way to lower the cost of health care is through increased government regulations. These piecemeal proposals will identify a specific problem that plagues the health care system, and then offer targeted government programs to address each one.

Take the cost of medicine. In response to the high cost of branded and originator biologic medicines, there has been a bipartisan push to impose price controls on drugs. Here too, history argues that the big-government approach will disappoint its proponents.

In post-revolution France, for instance, the government imposed grain price controls to ease the pain from the grain shortages that were plaguing the country. The price controls not only failed to alleviate the problem, they worsened the shortages and helped create an even greater economic crisis.

Rent control policies also exemplify the adverse consequences from government mandated pricing. The purpose of rent control is to expand the availability of affordable housing. The actual consequences, as exemplified by cities like New York and San Francisco, are housing shortages and sharp declines in housing quality.

No matter where they have been tried, price controls have always made bad situations worse because it is impossible for policymakers to have the necessary knowledge to dynamically set the efficient price level. Just as all of these past price control experiments ended up making a bad situation worse, applying price controls to the U.S. health care sector will further reduce the quality of care and create inequitable outcomes.

The advocates of price controls now are targeting the pharmaceutical industry with these ill-considered policies. Take H.R. 3, the Lower Drug Costs Now Act. As the name implies, the bills proponents hope to lower the cost of drugs by empowering the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to negotiate prices on certain drugs. Manufacturers who refused to negotiate with the government would face a 95% tax on sales revenue (not profits). Such a lopsided structure is not a negotiation, it is the government mandating a price regardless of its economic viability.

The consequences from implementing price controls on the pharmaceutical industry will be no different than the consequences that occurred in the grain or housing markets. But, one does not even have to look toward these markets to see the consequences. Just look to the European Unions drug industry, where pharmaceutical price controls were implemented two decades ago.

Before its price controls, EU firms were the global leaders in biopharmaceutical innovation. Since the implementation of price controls, research spending in the EU has stagnated, much of it diverting to the U.S. where price controls do not exist. Over time, these diverging trends have enabled the U.S. to become the global innovation leader.

As a result, the EU has endured many adverse consequences. Access to existing medicines have faltered. While the U.S. has access to nearly 90% of newly launched medicines, patients in Germany only have access to 71%. In France, the access rate is even lower at 48%.

By some estimates, the R&D slowdown has led to 46 fewer medicines being introduced into the marketplace. The actual costs to patients (worldwide) from not having access to new (possibly better) treatments is unknowable. The lost savings potential these medicines could have created, by avoiding the need for other more expensive health care treatments (e.g. surgeries), is also unknowable. The EU has also faced economic consequences as the lost R&D activity has cost the EU nearly 1,700 high paying research jobs.

History clearly illustrates that government mandated prices create more harm than good. Should drug price controls, such as H.R. 3, be implemented, the U.S. will not be exempt from the adverse consequences. Instead, access will be reduced, innovation will suffer, and the economy will be less vibrant.

In contrast to this government approach, as I have discussed here, there is a better way. Too many market barriers currently exist that are inhibiting a more competitive market for medicines (particularly the high-cost biologic medicines) to develop. The best way to achieve the dual goals of incenting innovation and promoting affordability is to remove these barriers and empower a competitive market to directly lower the costs of medicines.

I am a Senior Fellow in Business and Economics at the Pacific Research Institute and the Director of PRI's Center for Medical Economics and Innovation. My research explores the connection between macroeconomic policies and economic outcomes, with a focus on the health care and energy industries. I have over 25 years of experience advising Fortune 500 companies, medium and small businesses, and trade associations. I received my Ph.D. in economics from George Mason University.

I am a Senior Fellow in Business and Economics at the Pacific Research Institute and the Director of PRI's Center for Medical Economics and Innovation. My research explores the connection between macroeconomic policies and economic outcomes, with a focus on the health care and energy industries. I have over 25 years of experience advising Fortune 500 companies, medium and small businesses, and trade associations. I received my Ph.D. in economics from George Mason University.

retransmission: bluestone increases npv of cerro blanco by over 275% to $907 million and peak gold production to over 300 koz per year

retransmission: bluestone increases npv of cerro blanco by over 275% to $907 million and peak gold production to over 300 koz per year

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - February 28, 2021) - Bluestone Resources Inc. (TSXV: BSR) (OTCQB: BBSRF) ("Bluestone" or the "Company") is pleased to announce the findings of a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") that highlights an optimized project which doubles the gold resource ounces and production profile which effectively triples the NPV5% of the project to $907 million.

The recent completion of advanced engineering and optimization work has significantly enhanced the understanding of the project and presented an opportunity to capitalize on its near-surface, high-grade mineralization through an open pit development scenario. This is a major change to Bluestone's corporate strategy that will fully maximize the value of the Cerro Blanco gold project for all stakeholders.

Jack Lundin, CEO, commented, "This new development scenario outlines a great project which is capable of producing over 300,000 ounces of gold per year at first decile AISC. With the onboarding of key project personnel and completion of a successful drill campaign, 2020 presented us with the opportunity to dig deep into the technical and social elements of the project and evaluate all aspects. Following an initial review of the viability for a surface mining operation, discussions were held with key national stakeholders and authorities to confirm the endorsement for a project of this scale in Guatemala. Bluestone is committed to adopting world class responsible mining practices for the future of sustainable mining."

David Cass, Vice President of Exploration commented, "The pivot to surface mining is a culmination of our increased understanding of the geology and grade distribution that will realize the full potential of the Cerro Blanco low-sulphidation mineralization. The inverted wedge shape of the deposit with its upper half forming the Cerro Blanco hill lends itself to surface mining with a low strip ratio. The extensive drilling undertaken to date of the high-grade vein swarms and their surrounding low-grade mineralized envelopes show impressive intercepts, including 203.8 meters grading 2.3 g/t Au and 4.1 g/t Ag (CB20-420) and 87.2 meters grading 5.3 g/t Au and 26 g/t Ag (UGCB18-89). The low-grade mineralization present in the Salinas cap rocks, where we currently have five drill rigs operational, make up a fifth of the Measured & Indicated Resource ounces and show excellent potential to further grow the resource by additional drilling."

The Cerro Blanco Gold Project is located in south-eastern Guatemala and currently hosts 3.0 million ounces ("Moz") of gold in the Measured & Indicated Mineral Resource category and 0.25 million ounces of gold in the Inferred Mineral Resource category, as set out in Table 3.

The PEA evaluates recovery of gold and silver from a 15,000 tonne-per-day ("tpd") open pit operation, with a conventional process plant that will include crushing, grinding, and agitated leaching followed by a carbon-in-pulp recovery process to produce dor bars.

Bluestone continues to advance the Cerro Blanco Project application through the national processes, which is well understood and defined. The Company is supported by a reputable in-country expert with extensive experience in permitting natural resource and industrial projects in Guatemala.

The Company's goal is to prepare a coordinated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment document that aligns with the International Finance Corporation Performance Standards, Equator Principles, as well as national requirements. Engagement with local communities and other stakeholders is essential to Bluestone and will remain on-going throughout the permitting process.

Jack Lundin, CEO, commented, "The timeline and path to production is being worked through in detail. We plan to follow the well-defined process in Guatemala to advance an EIA application, in parallel with completing a bankable Feasibility Study by the end of 2021 and early in 2022, respectively. This Feasibility Study will serve as the blueprint for our development which we are targeting to initiate in late 2022, when we anticipate receiving our EIA permit."

Cerro Blanco is a classic hot springs-related low-sulphidation epithermal gold-silver deposit comprising both high-grade vein and low-grade disseminated mineralization. Most of the high-grade mineralization is hosted in the Mita unit as two upward-flaring vein swarms (North and South Zones) that converge downwards and merge into basal feeder veins where drilling has demonstrated significant widths of high-grade mineralization, e.g. 15.5 meters 21.4 g/t Au and 52 g/t Ag. Bonanza gold grades are associated with ginguru banding and carbonate replacement textures. Sulphide contents are low, typically <3 volume %.

The Mita rocks are overlain by the Salinas Unit, a sub-horizontal sequence of volcanogenic sediments and sinter horizons approximately 100 meters thick that form the low-lying hill at the project. Low-grade disseminated and veinlet mineralization within and as halos around the high-grade vein swarms is well documented in drilling since discovery of the deposit, with grades typically ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 g/t Au. The overlying Salinas cap rocks are also host to low-grade mineralization associated with silicified conglomerates and rhyolite intrusion breccias.

In profile, the inverted wedge-shape of the high-grade veins (upward flaring arrays) and their low-grade halos overlain by the mineralized Salinas cap rocks to surface render the deposit amenable to exploitation by surface methods with a low strip ratio.

The mineral resource has a footprint of 800 x 400 meters between elevations of 525 meters and 200 meters above sea level. The mineral resource estimate is the result of 141,969 meters of drilling by Bluestone and previous operators (1,256 drill holes and channel samples by Bluestone) with the majority of meters drilled after the completion of the current EIA. The 3.4 kilometres of underground infrastructure that was invested as a result of this permit allowed underground mapping, sampling, and over 30,000 meters of underground drilling that was critical to Bluestone's current understanding and validation of the Cerro Blanco geological model. The mineral resource estimate is based on a scenario that considers open pit mining methods and therefore required improved geological models of the lithologic units. These broad mineralized lithologies are host to the high-grade veins that have been the focus of the potential underground mining scenario. The resulting domain models and estimation strategy was designed to accurately represent the grade distribution.

Effective date: December 31, 2020. All mineral resources have been estimated in accordance with Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM") definitions, as required under NI 43-101.

The PEA is preliminary in nature, it includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have not demonstrated economic viability. The mineral resources may be affected by subsequent assessment of mining, environmental, processing, permitting, taxation, socio-economic and other factors.

The mineral resource estimates for Cerro Blanco were prepared to industry standards and best practices and verified by Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., an Independent Qualified Person for the purposes of NI 43-101. The mineral resources were estimated using commercial mine modelling and geostatistical software.

The deposit was segregated into multiple estimation domains based on geologic models for each of the mineralized veins and the Salinas and Mita host lithologies including sinter units. Gold and silver block grades were estimated from capped composited samples in a single pass.

The mineral resources were estimated using inverse distance to the third power interpolation for the continuous vein domains, and the Salinas and Mita host units were estimated using ordinary kriging. Search ellipse anisotropy and orientation were guided by the orientation of the vein solids models and omni-directional ellipsoids were employed in the host and sinter zones. Specific gravities were assigned to individual rock types and assigned on a block-by-block basis.

The PEA is preliminary in nature, it may include mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the PEA will be realized. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have not demonstrated economic viability. The mineral resources may be affected by subsequent assessment of mining, environmental, processing, permitting, taxation, socio-economic, and other factors.

An open-pit mining scenario is the basis for this PEA. The owner-operated mining fleet will utilize 65 tonne trucks matched with 7.0 cubic meter hydraulic shovels supported by 8.2 cubic meter front-end wheel loaders.

The mine designs and scheduling were engineered to feed 5.04 Mt per year (15,000 tpd) of mill feed to the process plant at a strip ratio of 2.36 and LOM mining cost of $2.95/t. A total of 52.2 Mt of mill feed averaging 1.60 g/t gold and 7.26 g/t silver (1.68 g/t Au Eq.), is to be processed over the life of mine from the main pit area. Mill feed will be trucked to a primary crusher located to the east of the main pit. Waste totalling 123.5 Mt will be placed in a waste storage facility. Open-pit mining dilution has been estimated with a dilution skin of 0.5 meters resulting in 7.2% dilution at a grade of 0.30 g/t gold and 2.29 g/t silver.

Standard pit slopes were applied to the mine design. The pit slopes are designed with inter-ramp angles of 52 degrees with an overall slope angle of 49 degrees. Mining will take place on 5-meter benches.

The cut-off grade for mill feed material was estimated using a $1,500/oz gold price and gold cut-off grade (CoG) of 0.48 g/t AuEq. Other costs and factors used for gold cut-off grade determination were process, G&A, and other costs of $20.21/tonne, a royalty of $30.64 /oz Au and a gold metallurgical recovery of 91%, and a silver metallurgical recovery of 85%.

Tonnages are rounded to the nearest 1,000 tonnes, metal grades are rounded to two decimal place. Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units; contained gold and silver are reported as thousands of troy ounces.

The PEA is based on treating 5.04 million dry tonnes mineralized material per year at an average feed grade of 1.60 g/t gold and 7.26 g/t silver through a conventional cyanide leach process plant to produce dor. The flowsheet is very similar to the previous underground mine option and includes primary crushing, single train semi-autogenous (SAG) mill and ball mill to produce a target grind size of 80% passing 53 microns, atmospheric pre-oxidation, 48-hour cyanide leach, carbon-in-pulp carousel adsorption circuit, Zadra elution circuit, gold room and filtered tailings. Based on PEA metallurgical test work, the expected recoveries are 91% for gold and 85% for silver.

Filtered tailings will be configured in a dry stack facility and eliminate the need for the construction and operation of a traditional tailings impoundment. The adoption of this technology puts the Cerro Blanco Project at the forefront of responsible mining practices being adopted for the future of sustainable mining globally.

Initial capital to fund construction and commissioning is estimated at $548 million. The Cerro Blanco Gold Project benefits from a significant amount of infrastructure already in place including a water treatment plant, maintenance and warehouse facilities, offices, and communications systems. The project benefits from being located eight kilometres from the Pan American Highway.

All-in sustaining costs are presented as defined by the World Gold Council less corporate G&A. Calculated as: (refining costs + third party royalties + operating costs + sustaining capital costs + closure capital costs - payable silver ounces value) / payable gold ounces.

The project is located approximately 160 kilometres southeast of Guatemala City. The site is accessible via the Pan-American Highway (CA1) through the town of Asuncin Mita. Existing infrastructure is in place to provide year-round access, an upgraded access road, bridge, and a new power transmission line will be installed as part of the construction of the project. Guatemala has 400 kilometres of coastline, with the closest deep-water port (Puerto Quetzal) on the Pacific Ocean, which is connected by good highway access to the project.

Bluestone is a values-based company where environmental and community stewardship are integral to our core values. We live in the communities we operate in and follow best practices to maximize benefits for our stakeholders. The project and local team have been part of the local community for over a decade and Bluestone is active in engaging with the stakeholders around the project.

The development of the project is expected to provide substantial economic benefits to Guatemala, both locally and at a national level. The project is expected to generate direct employment of over 500 people once in operation. It is estimated that during production the mine will contribute about $160 million annually and approximately $1.8 billion over the life of the mine to the Guatemalan economy through direct employee wages, consumables, taxes, and royalties. In addition, the project is expected to generate several thousand additional indirect jobs with local suppliers and service providers.

A key priority will be to continue to train and develop skills of the local workforce as the project advances which is in line with Bluestone's philosophy of working with our stakeholders and communities.

In 2020 Bluestone engaged a third-party consultant to complete an updated environmental social impact assessment that was used as the basis to complete environmental and social due diligence to International Finance Corporation Performance Standards.

In addition, Bluestone completed an initial Sustainable Development Summary, chronicling environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Our goal is to build stakeholder trust by providing a transparent account of our contributions, impacts, and relationships over time. We are working toward alignment with Global Reporting Initiative, the Equator Principles, and the International Finance Corporation Environmental and Social Performance Standards.

Bluestone engaged a consortium of independent consultants, led by G Mining Services Inc., an international engineering firm with extensive experience in both the construction and operation of mining projects, to complete the Preliminary Economic Assessment.

The Technical Report summarizing the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment is being prepared in accordance with NI 43-101 and will be filed under the Company's profile on SEDAR within 45 days of this press release. The Qualified Persons have reviewed and verified that the scientific and technical information in respect to the PEA in this press release is accurate and approve the written disclosure of such information.

Other than as set forth above, all scientific and technical information contained in this press release has been reviewed, verified, and approved by David Cass, P.Geo., the Company's Vice President Exploration, a Qualified Persons under NI 43-101.

The Cerro Blanco Gold Project is an advanced stage near surface development project. A PEA on the project highlighted an asset capable of producing over 300 koz/yr with an average annual production of 231 koz/yr at all-in sustaining costs of ~$642/oz (as defined per World Gold Council guidelines, less corporate general and administration costs) over an initial 11-year mine life. The Company trades under the symbol "BSR" on the TSX Venture Exchange and "BBSRF" on the OTCQB.

For further information, please contact:Bluestone Resources Inc.Stephen Williams | VP Corporate Development & Investor RelationsPhone: +1 [email protected]rces.ca

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, "forward-looking statements"). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events, or developments that Bluestone Resources Inc. ("Bluestone" or the "Company") believes, expects, or anticipates will or may occur in the future including, without limitation: the estimated value of the Cerro Blanco Project (the "Project"); the planned open pit development scenario for the Project; the estimated gold production volume per year from the Project; gold and silver price estimates used in the preliminary economic assessment ("PEA"); additional financial estimates of Project economics resulting from the PEA, including peak and average annual gold productions amounts, average all-in sustaining costs, average annual free cash flow, after-tax net present value ("NPV"), after-tax internal rate of return, initial capital requirements, life of mine gold and silver production amounts, measured and indicated resources and NPV assuming a higher gold price estimate; the Company's plan to advance an EIA application in parallel to completing a bankable Feasibility Study by the end of 2021; the Company's target to initiate Project development in the second half of 2022; anticipated receipt of an EIA permit in the second half of 2022; mineral resource estimates; the estimated tonne-per-day recovery volume of the planned open pit operation; the planned conventional process plant and associated processing methods; the Company's goal to prepare a coordinated Environmental and Social Impact Assessment document that aligns with the IFC Performance Standards, Equator Principles as well as national requirements; engagement with local communities and stakeholders to remain on-going through the process; the Company's plan to advance the development of the EIA document in 2021 for submittal prior to the end of the year; the reasonable prospect of eventual economic extraction demonstrated by reported mineral resources; gold and silver price estimates and a reasonable contingency factor used as the basis for mineral resource estimate cut-off grades; reasonable expectation that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration; results of mineral resource estimate sensitivity analysis; uncertainty that the PEA will be realized; the potential for subsequent assessment of mining, environmental, processing, permitting, taxation, socio-economic and other factors to affect mineral resources; estimated diluted mill feed to be processed over the life of mine from the main pit area; planned trucking of mill feed to a primary crushed located to the east of the main pit; amount of waste to be stored in a dump adjacent to the main pit; estimated open-pit mining dilution; measured and indicated mill feed amounts; estimated process plant capacity in tonnes per day of ore; planned processing rate measured in dry tonnes per year and average feed grade thereof; details of planned processing, including pre-oxidation, 48-hour leach and carbon-in-pulp absorption circuit elements and expected gold and silver recovery percentage to produce a dore; estimated initial capital required to fund construction and commissioning; beneficial existence of a significant amount of development already in place, a water treatment plant, maintenance and warehouse facilities, offices and communications; capital and operating cost estimates; estimated all-in cash costs including sustaining capex; planned installation of a new power transmission line as part of the construction of the Project; the Project's expected economic benefits to Guatemala. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based on information currently available to Bluestone and often use words such as "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "estimates", "intends", "may", or variations thereof or the negative of any of these terms.

All forward-looking statements are made based on Bluestone's current beliefs as well as various assumptions made by Bluestone and information currently available to Bluestone. Generally, these assumptions include, among others: the presence of and continuity of metals at the Cerro Blanco Project at estimated grades; the availability of personnel, machinery, and equipment at estimated prices and within estimated delivery times; currency exchange rates; metals sales prices and exchange rates assumed; appropriate discount rates applied to the cash flows in economic analyses; tax rates and royalty rates applicable to the proposed mining operations; the availability of acceptable financing; the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); anticipated mining losses and dilution; success in realizing proposed operations; and anticipated timelines for community consultations and the impact of those consultations on the regulatory approval process.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of Bluestone to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements and, even if such actual results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, Bluestone. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things: potential changes to the mining method and the current development strategy; risks and uncertainties related to expected production rates; timing and amount of production and total costs of production; risks and uncertainties related to the ability to obtain, amend, or maintain necessary licenses, permits, or surface rights; risks associated with technical difficulties in connection with mining development activities; risks and uncertainties related to the accuracy of mineral resource estimates and estimates of future production, future cash flow, total costs of production, and diminishing quantities or grades of mineral resources; risks associated with geopolitical uncertainty and political and economic instability in Guatemala; risks related to global epidemics or pandemics and other health crises, including the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); risks and uncertainties related to interruptions in production; the possibility that future exploration, development, or mining results will not be consistent with Bluestone's expectations; uncertain political and economic environments and relationships with local communities and governmental authorities; risks relating to variations in the mineral content within the mineral identified as mineral resources from that predicted; variations in rates of recovery and extraction; developments in world metals markets; and risks related to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. For a further discussion of risks relevant to Bluestone, see "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2019, available on the Company's SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made, and except as may be required by applicable securities laws, Bluestone disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results, or otherwise. Although Bluestone believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and accordingly, undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to their inherent uncertainty. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.

The Company has included certain non-International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") measures in this news release. The Company believes that these measures, in addition to measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, provide investors an improved ability to evaluate the underlying performance of the Company and to compare it to information reported by other companies. The non-IFRS measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. These measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers.

The Company calculates AISC as the sum of refining costs, third party royalties, site operating costs, sustaining capital costs, and closure capital costs all divided by the gold ounces sold to arrive at a per ounce amount. Other companies may calculate this measure differently as a result of differences in underlying principles and policies applied. Differences may also arise due to a different definition of sustaining versus non-sustaining capital.

AISC and costs are calculated based on the definitions published by the World Gold Council ("WGC") (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by 18 gold mining companies from around the world). The WGC is not a regulatory organization.

The U.S.-listed shares of several Chinese electric-vehicle makers were trading down on Wednesday after the Chinese government imposed restrictions on ride-hailing giant DiDi Global (NYSE: DIDI) following its initial public offering in New York. Li Auto (NASDAQ: LI) was down about 4.6%. NIO (NYSE: NIO) was down about 6.9%.

In this article, we discuss the 10 stocks Cathie Wood is selling. If you want to skip our detailed analysis of these stocks, go directly to the 5 Stocks Cathie Wood Is Selling. Cathie Wood, the chief of ARK Investment Management, a New York-based hedge fund with a portfolio value of over $50 billion at []

Shares ofApple (NASDAQ: AAPL) rose 1.8% to a record closing high of $144.57 on Wednesday after a respected Wall Street investment bank issued bullish commentary on the popular tech stock. JPMorgan analyst Samik Chatterjee reiterated his overweight rating on Apple's stock yesterday and boosted his share price forecast from $165 to $170. JPMorgan's analysts are bullish on Apple.

Workhorse Group (NASDAQ: WKHS) stock opened at $13.85, dropped to a low of $12.43 during the day and closed at $12.51, a one-day tumble of 9.61% on Wednesday. Shares in Workhorse, a maker of electric trucks, have been a favorite among retail investors and were as high as $17 last week. Workhorse, which lost out to Oshkosh Defense, a division of Oshkosh, on the contract to make the next-generation vehicles for the U.S. Postal Service, has lodged a formal complaint with the Federal Claims Court regarding the bid process.

What happened Shares of Moderna (NASDAQ: MRNA) were falling 4.7% lower as of 11:55 a.m. EDT on Wednesday. The decline came after the company reported that the first participant has been dosed in a phase 1/2 study evaluating its quadrivalent flu vaccine.

(Bloomberg) -- Jeff Bezos is leaving the rest of the world behind when it comes to wealth accumulation.The worlds richest man reached a record $211 billion net worth Tuesday after Amazon.com Inc. shares rose 4.7% after the Pentagon announced it was canceling a cloud-computing contract with rival Microsoft Corp. The rally raised Bezoss fortune by $8.4 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.The last time anyone in the Bloomberg ranking neared this amount was in January, when Tesl

Weve all heard the market clich to buy low and sell high as the key to making money. And if you can pull it off, it works. The key to success, of course, is finding the stocks that are currently trading low but are primed for gains. This implies a profile. Were looking for stocks with a combination of depressed share prices and recent Buy ratings from top analysts. Using TipRanks platform, we identify three stocks that fit. And better yet, their average upside potential for the next year ra

In this article, we will discuss the 10 best pharmaceutical stocks to buy according to billionaire Joseph Edelman. If you want to skip our detailed analysis of Edelmans history, investment philosophy, and hedge fund performance, go directly to the 5 Best Pharmaceutical Stocks to Buy According to Billionaire Joseph Edelman. Joseph Edelman was born in []

In this article, we discuss the 10 stocks Reddits WallStreetBets is buying in July 2021. If you want to skip our detailed analysis of these stocks, go directly to the 5 Stocks Reddits WallStreetBets is Buying in July 2021. Reddit forum WallStreetBets, with a user base of more than 10.6 million, has become one of []

Lemonade (NYSE: LMND) was one of the hottest tech IPOs of 2020. Since then Lemonade's stock price tumbled to about $60 by mid-May. The Texas winter storm in February sparked an unexpected surge in insurance claims, while inflation concerns in the broader economy torpedoed frothier growth stocks like Lemonade. Lemonade's stock price has subsequently rebounded above $100 a share again, but is this volatile stock worth buying at these levels?

bluestone advances basic engineering at cerro blanco, provides project update and plans for 2021

bluestone advances basic engineering at cerro blanco, provides project update and plans for 2021

Vancouver, British Columbia--(Newsfile Corp. - January 26, 2021) - Bluestone Resources Inc. (TSXV: BSR) (OTCQB: BBSRF) ("Bluestone" or the "Company") is pleased to provide an update on the Company's activities during 2020 at its 100% owned Cerro Blanco gold project located in southern Guatemala ("Project"), and provide an outlook on plans for 2021. During 2020, a Project Readiness Update ("PRU") was undertaken which involved a thorough and extensive review of the current mine plan, engineering, process flow sheet, capital and operating cost estimates, along with the execution strategy. The PRU will be further optimized in H1 2021 following the completion of an updated mineral resource estimate and mine plan to incorporate the recently completed 2020 drill program.

Jack Lundin, CEO, commented, "2020 was no doubt a challenging year but from the onset of the pandemic we were able to adapt quickly to this new environment and are feeling motivated entering into 2021. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic and the travel restrictions in place in Guatemala for the last eight months of the year, the commitment and hard work of our Guatemalan team, together with the firm support of both the Guatemalan government and local stakeholders, allowed us to advance the Project in several key disciplines which included completion of basic engineering, validation of the underground mine plan, as well as the 2019 Feasibility Study ("FS") production profile over the life-of-mine. Additionally, we were able to successfully complete a 15,000 meters infill drill program in the South Zone in December. We have been supported with a steady flow of great results, including 15 meters grading 21.6 g/t gold and 52 g/t silver plus truly bonanza grades of up to 1,380 g/t gold and 2,194 g/t silver over 1.2 meters (see press releases June 9, 2020 and November 19, 2020)."

Regarding outlook for 2021, Mr. Lundin added, "The Project execution team will continue to work to optimize the Project as the Company waits for the lagging assay results. We have seen the upside potential in the near surface high grade intercepts and are confident we will be able to increase the mine life at Cerro Blanco with the rest of the results. As we wait, additional studies are currently being undertaken that look at a variety of development options. Our focus remains on maximizing the potential benefits at Cerro Blanco for all of our stakeholders."

The FS envisioned a 1,250 tonne per day ("tpd") mine producing approximately 113,000 ounces of gold a year over an eight-year mine life at an AISC of $579/oz (see NI 43-101 technical report titled "Feasibility Study NI-43-101 Technical Report Cerro Blanco Project Guatemala", prepared by Maz Mohaseb, P.Eng., Michael Makarenko, P.Eng., Kelly McLeod, P.Eng., Richard Boehnke, P.Eng., Mike Levy, P.E., Garth Kirkham, P.Geo., Hhan Olsen, P.G., CPG and Bryan Ulrich, P.E., dated January 29, 2019 and filed on www.sedar.com under Bluestone's SEDAR profile.) Since that time, Bluestone has completed an infill drill program in the North Zone of the deposit and an updated resource estimate which added over 200,000 ounces of gold in Measured and Indicated categories (see Company press release November 6, 2019). Additionally, with the onboarding of key Project development personnel, the Company has conducted an in-depth technical analysis of the entire Project and completed basic engineering and trade-off studies to optimize future operations.

The PRU is intended as an interim study to build off the compilation of geological, engineering, and hydrological studies performed during the FS. Further optimizations to the mine plan are expected following an updated resource estimate in H1 2021. The mine plan review to date, along with the decision to purchase the mining mobile fleet during the construction period, combined with the additional detail of basic engineering, is expected to result in moderate increases to capital and operating costs compared to the FS; however, the impact of an increased gold price, additional ounces recoverable, and other optimizations are expected to offset this, resulting in robust Project economics in line with the FS.

Highlights below are provided as an interim update and are therefore preliminary in nature, incorporating results of recent basic engineering and various optimization and trade-off studies. The reader is cautioned that the following highlights are considered Forward Looking Statements and subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results to differ materially from those discussed (see Forward Looking Statements at the end of this press release).

Darren Klinck, President, commented, "The additional engineering work confirms that Cerro Blanco would be a low-cost producer with first quartile AISC as demonstrated in the FS. The gold environment has since improved significantly, and offsets increases to capex due to advancing engineering and de-risking of the Project. Looking forward into 2021, we intend to update the Cerro Blanco resource estimate and mine plan in the first half of the year."

Significant advancements were made during 2020 with the Project Finance negotiations which included the completion of independent technical engineering, environmental, and social reports along with advancements to long-form term sheets. Further corporate and project finance updates will be provided in Q1. As of January 1, 2021, Bluestone had a cash balance of approximately $50 million.

Further to the resource update in 2019, an additional 15,171 meters of infill drilling were completed in 2020 which focused on the South Zone with the goal to improve the definition of key veins in parallel to expanding the mineralization of known veins outside of the current resource envelope. Recently reported results included the highest-grade intercept ever drilled at the Project, grading 1,380 g/t gold and 2,194 g/t silver over 1.2 meters (see press Release November 19, 2020). The 2020 infill drill program was successfully completed; however, assay results have been delayed due to slower processing times because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results from approximately half of the program are still outstanding but once received, the resource estimate and mine plan will be updated.

A draft LOM plan was updated at the end of 2020 and it is anticipated that further optimizations will be captured following the updated resource estimate over the next few months. The average annual production is expected to be in line with the FS over the LOM. A self-perform vs contractor mining trade- off study was undertaken and the self-perform mine development option was deemed to be the best option. This is a change in the execution strategy compared to the FS in addition to the purchase of the mobile mining fleet now being capitalized.

Since the FS, Bluestone has undertaken additional metallurgical test work which has confirmed the flow sheet and resulted in some simplifications of the process plant design. These optimizations include changing the comminution circuit from three-stage crushing, two ball mill configurations to single stage crushing followed by SAG and ball mill configuration.

David Cass, P.Geo., Vice President Exploration, is the designated Qualified Person for this news release within the meaning of National Instrument 43-101 and has reviewed and verified that the scientific and technical information set out above in this news release is accurate and therefore approves this written disclosure of the technical information.

Bluestone Resources is a mineral exploration and development company that is focused on advancing its 100%-owned high-grade Cerro Blanco Gold and Mita Geothermal projects located in Guatemala. The Company trades under the symbol "BSR" on the TSX Venture Exchange and "BBSRF" on the OTCQB.

For further information, please contact:Bluestone Resources Inc.Stephen Williams | VP Corporate Development & Investor RelationsPhone: +1 [email protected]

Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, "forward-looking statements"). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events, or developments that Bluestone Resources Inc. ("Bluestone" or the "Company") believes, expects, or anticipates will or may occur in the future including, without limitation: the Company's plans for 2021; the anticipated results of the PRU and expected optimizations; the Company's current expectations regarding the mining method and alternative development options; completion of Project financing; anticipated timing and results of exploration, drilling, and assays; increasing the amount of measured mineral and indicated mineral resources; the proposed timeline and benefits of further drilling; the proposed timeline and benefits of the Feasibility Study; statements about the Company's plans for its mineral properties; Bluestone's business strategy, plans, and outlook; the future financial or operating performance of Bluestone; capital expenditures, corporate general and administration expenses, and exploration and development expenses; expected working capital requirements; the future financial estimates of the Cerro Blanco Project economics, including estimates of capital costs of constructing mine facilities, and bringing a mine into production, and of sustaining capital costs, estimates of operating costs and total costs, net present value and economic returns; proposed production timelines and rates; funding availability; resource estimates; and future exploration and operating plans are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current expectations or beliefs of the Company based on information currently available to Bluestone and often use words such as "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "estimates", "intends", "may", or variations thereof or the negative of any of these terms.

All forward-looking statements are made based on Bluestone's current beliefs as well as various assumptions made by Bluestone and information currently available to Bluestone. Generally, these assumptions include, among others: the presence of and continuity of metals at the Cerro Blanco Project at estimated grades; the availability of personnel, machinery, and equipment at estimated prices and within estimated delivery times; currency exchange rates; metals sales prices and exchange rates assumed; appropriate discount rates applied to the cash flows in economic analyses; tax rates and royalty rates applicable to the proposed mining operations; the availability of acceptable financing; the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); anticipated mining losses and dilution; success in realizing proposed operations; and anticipated timelines for community consultations and the impact of those consultations on the regulatory approval process.

Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual results of Bluestone to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements and, even if such actual results are realized or substantially realized, there can be no assurance that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, Bluestone. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things: potential changes to the mining method and the current development strategy; risks and uncertainties related to expected production rates; timing and amount of production and total costs of production; risks and uncertainties related to the ability to obtain, amend, or maintain necessary licenses, permits, or surface rights; risks associated with technical difficulties in connection with mining development activities; risks and uncertainties related to the accuracy of mineral resource estimates and estimates of future production, future cash flow, total costs of production, and diminishing quantities or grades of mineral resources; risks associated with geopolitical uncertainty and political and economic instability in Guatemala; risks related to global epidemics or pandemics and other health crises, including the impact of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19); risks and uncertainties related to interruptions in production; the possibility that future exploration, development, or mining results will not be consistent with Bluestone's expectations; uncertain political and economic environments and relationships with local communities and governmental authorities; risks relating to variations in the mineral content within the mineral identified as mineral resources from that predicted; variations in rates of recovery and extraction; developments in world metals markets; and risks related to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. For a further discussion of risks relevant to Bluestone, see "Risk Factors" in the Company's annual information form for the year ended December 31, 2019, available on the Company's SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made, and except as may be required by applicable securities laws, Bluestone disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or results, or otherwise. Although Bluestone believes that the assumptions inherent in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and accordingly, undue reliance should not be put on such statements due to their inherent uncertainty. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.

The Company has included certain non-International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") measures in this news release. The Company believes that these measures, in addition to measures prepared in accordance with IFRS, provide investors an improved ability to evaluate the underlying performance of the Company and to compare it to information reported by other companies. The non-IFRS measures are intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. These measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed under IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers.

The Company calculates AISC as the sum of refining costs, third party royalties, site operating costs, sustaining capital costs, and closure capital costs all divided by the gold ounces sold to arrive at a per ounce amount. Other companies may calculate this measure differently as a result of differences in underlying principles and policies applied. Differences may also arise due to a different definition of sustaining versus non-sustaining capital.

AISC and costs are calculated based on the definitions published by the World Gold Council ("WGC") (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by 18 gold mining companies from around the world). The WGC is not a regulatory organization.

The U.S.-listed shares of several Chinese electric-vehicle makers were trading down on Wednesday after the Chinese government imposed restrictions on ride-hailing giant DiDi Global (NYSE: DIDI) following its initial public offering in New York. Li Auto (NASDAQ: LI) was down about 4.6%. NIO (NYSE: NIO) was down about 6.9%.

In this article, we discuss the 10 stocks Cathie Wood is selling. If you want to skip our detailed analysis of these stocks, go directly to the 5 Stocks Cathie Wood Is Selling. Cathie Wood, the chief of ARK Investment Management, a New York-based hedge fund with a portfolio value of over $50 billion at []

Shares ofApple (NASDAQ: AAPL) rose 1.8% to a record closing high of $144.57 on Wednesday after a respected Wall Street investment bank issued bullish commentary on the popular tech stock. JPMorgan analyst Samik Chatterjee reiterated his overweight rating on Apple's stock yesterday and boosted his share price forecast from $165 to $170. JPMorgan's analysts are bullish on Apple.

Workhorse Group (NASDAQ: WKHS) stock opened at $13.85, dropped to a low of $12.43 during the day and closed at $12.51, a one-day tumble of 9.61% on Wednesday. Shares in Workhorse, a maker of electric trucks, have been a favorite among retail investors and were as high as $17 last week. Workhorse, which lost out to Oshkosh Defense, a division of Oshkosh, on the contract to make the next-generation vehicles for the U.S. Postal Service, has lodged a formal complaint with the Federal Claims Court regarding the bid process.

What happened Shares of Moderna (NASDAQ: MRNA) were falling 4.7% lower as of 11:55 a.m. EDT on Wednesday. The decline came after the company reported that the first participant has been dosed in a phase 1/2 study evaluating its quadrivalent flu vaccine.

(Bloomberg) -- Jeff Bezos is leaving the rest of the world behind when it comes to wealth accumulation.The worlds richest man reached a record $211 billion net worth Tuesday after Amazon.com Inc. shares rose 4.7% after the Pentagon announced it was canceling a cloud-computing contract with rival Microsoft Corp. The rally raised Bezoss fortune by $8.4 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.The last time anyone in the Bloomberg ranking neared this amount was in January, when Tesl

Weve all heard the market clich to buy low and sell high as the key to making money. And if you can pull it off, it works. The key to success, of course, is finding the stocks that are currently trading low but are primed for gains. This implies a profile. Were looking for stocks with a combination of depressed share prices and recent Buy ratings from top analysts. Using TipRanks platform, we identify three stocks that fit. And better yet, their average upside potential for the next year ra

In this article, we will discuss the 10 best pharmaceutical stocks to buy according to billionaire Joseph Edelman. If you want to skip our detailed analysis of Edelmans history, investment philosophy, and hedge fund performance, go directly to the 5 Best Pharmaceutical Stocks to Buy According to Billionaire Joseph Edelman. Joseph Edelman was born in []

In this article, we discuss the 10 stocks Reddits WallStreetBets is buying in July 2021. If you want to skip our detailed analysis of these stocks, go directly to the 5 Stocks Reddits WallStreetBets is Buying in July 2021. Reddit forum WallStreetBets, with a user base of more than 10.6 million, has become one of []

Lemonade (NYSE: LMND) was one of the hottest tech IPOs of 2020. Since then Lemonade's stock price tumbled to about $60 by mid-May. The Texas winter storm in February sparked an unexpected surge in insurance claims, while inflation concerns in the broader economy torpedoed frothier growth stocks like Lemonade. Lemonade's stock price has subsequently rebounded above $100 a share again, but is this volatile stock worth buying at these levels?

Related News
  1. metso gp cone crusher manual pdf
  2. cone crusher motor selection
  3. the cone crusher
  4. hydraulic cone crusher manufacturers
  5. large ilmenite cone crusher in iquique
  6. fan hydraulic crusher manufacturers
  7. small symons cone crusher for mining in brunei
  8. symons cone crusher working
  9. symons cone crusher components
  10. dxn hydraulic vsi crusher silica mining
  11. magnetic separation equipment for wolframite
  12. jaw crusher capacity calculation pdf
  13. manufacturers suppliers cone
  14. sand washing and dewatering plant india
  15. ball mill tube
  16. high gradient magnetic separator for iron ore in south africa
  17. ghana gold mining claims
  18. magnetic water
  19. kennett stone crusher
  20. classifier mobile plants tucson