Hello, my partner! Let's explore the mining machine together!

[email protected]

mineral dressing machine wet magnetic separator

wet high intensity magnetic separation

wet high intensity magnetic separation

WHIM is the short acronym for Wet High Intensity MagneticSeparation.At present, most U.S. iron raw materials are produced from magnetic taconites, which are ground to a nominal minus 270 mesh (53 micrometers), beneficiated by wet low-intensity magnetic separation, and pelletized. The taconite ore bodies generally contain 19 to 25 percent magnetic iron, defined as iron occurring in the mineral magnetite. Iron occurring in other minerals, such as iron silicates, siderite, and hematite, is generally lost in the tailings.

The iron-bearing materials intermediate in properties between the high-grade enriched iron ore deposits and the parent taconite are the oxidized taconites. The magnetite has been oxidized to hematite, and the iron silicates and siderite have been converted to goethite, a hydrated iron oxide. There may be some iron enrichment due to natural leaching of silica and migration and precipitation of iron ions in secondary iron oxide layers. Oxidized taconite is also called nonmagnetic taconite to distinguish it from the unaltered magnetic taconite. The western part of Minnesotas Mesabi Range contains in excess of 10 billion tons of oxidized taconite containing 30 to 40 percent iron. Typically, oxidized taconite surrounds and underlies an exhausted natural ore pit, while underlying the oxidized taconite is the parent taconite. In open pit mining of taconite, oxidized taconite is often removed as waste material. In some cases, oxidized taconite is being stockpiled for future use, in other cases, it is discarded with the overburden. The development of an economical method for beneficiating oxidized taconites would utilize a current waste material and convert the oxidized taconite from an iron ore resource to a reserve.

In the reduction roasting process, the hematite and goethite in the ore are converted to magnetite by heating in a reducing atmosphere at approximately 800 C. Although the first experimental plant was built on the Mesabi Range in 1934, the process has not been used commercially. The high operating cost of the energy consumed in roasting is partially compensated by reduced grinding costs and by energy returned in the conversion of magnetite to hematite during pellet induration. The capital cost, which is also high, would be reduced if roasted ore were processed in an existing magnetic separation plant. However, processing of reduction-roasted ore in a conventional taconite plant would require some modifications, because artificial magnetite has a higher remanence and coercivity than natural magnetite. After exposure to a magnetic field, very strong magnetite floccules, which entrain gangue particles, are formed. Demagnetization requires special high-frequency coils. Pilot plant results recently obtained by the Bureau of Mines show that the silica content of the artificial magnetite concentrate can be reduced to less than 5 percent while iron recovery is maintained at 80 percent by including a froth flotation step after the final magnetic separation stage.

Highly metamorphosed schistose iron ore from the Marquette range on Michigans Upper Peninsula has been successfully treated by froth flotation since 1956. The hematite in this ore occurs in the form of specularite, which is more easily beneficiated than the red or dull black hematite typical of oxidized taconites. The development of selective flocculation by the Bureau of Mines and research by the Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co. made flotation a feasible beneficiation method for the bulk of the Lake Superior regions oxidized taconite resources. The research resulted in the opening of the Tilden plant (Marquette range, Michigan), which has a capacity of 4 million tons of pellets per year; long-term plans call for tripling the plants capacity. Mesabi Range oxidized taconites can also be beneficiated by selective flocculation-flotation; however, the much greater content of goethite in the Minnesota oxidized taconites, compared with the Tilden ore, makes it more difficult to maintain high iron recovery. A typical flowsheet for Mesabi Range oxidized taconite is shown in figure 1.

The application of WHIM separation to the beneficiation of oxidized taconites received impetus from innovative separator designs developed by G. H. Jones and J. H. Carpenter in the early 1960s. Beginning in 1964, application of WHIM separation to Mesabi and Marquette range iron ores was tested on the pilot plant scale at the Mines Experiment Station (now the Mineral Resources Research Center) of the University of Minnesota. The flowsheet developed involved WHIM separation on rodmill-ground ore to remove coarse quartz and primary slimes amounting to 20 to 30 percent of the feed weight. The preconcentrate obtained was reground in a ball mill, and the final concentrate was produced by flotation. The flowsheet development was influenced by the fact that the WHIM separators available used soft-iron spheres as a matrix and were not capable of selectively recovering the iron oxides present in particles finer than 500 mesh (25 micrometers). After flotation, overall iron recoveries ranged from 72 to 78 percent. In 1974, Kelland and Maxwell demonstrated that a continuous pilot plant WHIM separator with a matrix designed to produce high field gradients could be used to preconcentrate oxidized taconite ground to 90 percent passing 400 mesh (37 micrometers) before flotation. When a single-stage operation employing a 10-cm length of stainless steel wool matrix was used, preconcentrates containing 49 to 54 percent iron, with iron recoveries ranging from 68 to 79 percent, were obtained.

On the basis of direct operating costs, exclusive of amortization, WHIM separation, either alone or in combination with flotation, is less costly than either reduction roasting or selective flocculation-flotation. The cost advantages of WHIM separation over flotation are decreased reagent, grinding, and water treatment costs. For commercial-scale machines, the energy required to energize the electromagnets, typically in the range of 1 to 5 kwhr/ton of ore treated per pass, is small compared with the 30 kwhr/ton required for grinding. From the standpoint of capital costs, WHIM separation is significantly more expensive than flotation but probably less expensive than reduction roasting. Since WHIM separation is a relatively new and untried technology for the processing of oxidized taconites, high investment expense is a significant barrier to its application. Even at the research and development level, progress has been hindered by the high cost of effective pilot-scale machines. To minimize capital costs, the number of magnetic separation stages must be kept to a minimum.

The possibility of beneficiating the sample by WHIM separation alone was evaluated in the laboratory on 1-kg samples (fig. 2). A sample of rodmill discharge was separated in an Eriez Model L-4 WHIM separator with a 20-cm-deep matrix of 0.6-cm iron spheres and a 0.5-tesla applied field. A coarse tailing containing 31.5 percent of the feed weight, but only 3.8 percent of the iron in the feed, was obtained. To achieve sufficient liberation of the ore, the preconcentrate was reground to 80 percent passing 400 mesh (37 micrometers). Separation of the reground material was carried out with a matrix of coarse stainless steel wool and a 1.0-tesla applied field. Two stages of separation produced a finisher concentrate containing 63.5 percent Fe and 5.5 percent SiO2 with an accompanying iron recovery of 73 percent.

The laboratory results have not been duplicated in the pilot plant. The WHIM separators available for this research have not performed satisfactorily in continuous operation on rodmill discharge; the separators have either given much lower iron recovery than expected from laboratory tests or have shown a tendency to plug up during extended runs. (Design criteria for avoiding these difficulties are discussed in a subsequent section.)

The Bureau of Mines most successful application of WHIM separation on a pilot plant scale has been as a method of increasing iron recovery in the selective flocculation-flotation process. The unit operations of figure 3 were used in conjunction with the flowsheet of figure 1. The WHIM separator recovered iron values from the scavenger flotation tailings. The magnetic concentrate, after thickening, was returned to the scavenger flotation cells. During a continuous 48-hour pilot plant test in which the magnetic concentrate was recycled to the flotation circuit, the iron recovered in the cleaner flotation concentrate was increased by 2 percent with no adverse effect on concentrate grade. Average metallurgical results for a 48-hour period during which flotation was producing a low-iron tailing are shown in figure 4. Preliminary results from 6-hour pilot plant tests on higher grade flotation tailings have indicated that up to 10 percentage units of iron can be recovered by WHIM scavenging. The MEA-Sala Carousel magnetic separator used was operated at 0.6 tesla with flow through the 9-cm matrix of coarse stainless steel wool controlled by gravity.

The flotation process used was the cationic flotation of the gangue. To improve the concentrate grade, more amine collector is added to ensure flotation of coarse gangue particles. However, the added collector can also cause flotation of fine iron oxides, leading to a decrease in recovery. By providing a means of recovering the fine iron, magnetic scavenging allows positive control of the final concentrate grade while minimizing loss of iron values in the final process tailing. An effective means of controlling iron recovery while maintaining close concentrate grade control is significant in treating an ore as variable in its characteristics as oxidized taconite.

Because alternative processing methods and alternative sources of ore exist, WHIM separation will be commercially applied to oxidized taconites only if it is cost competitive. The key to minimizing costs is to optimize the separator design for a particular application. A rational optimization procedure requires a mathematical model of separator performance as a function of the basic design and operating parameters.

Most existing models of WHIM separation can be classified as highly theoretical or purely empirical. During the past few years, there has been much interest in the development of theoretical models of WHIM separation based on particle trajectory calculations. Recent computer-based models have shown some degree of correspondence with experimental results after the introduction of two adjustable parameters for each particle size. Application of a theoretical model to a practical optimization problem would require a very extensive ore characterization study followed by systematic testwork to determine the adjustable parameters. The calculations involved in finding an optimum separator design might be too cumbersome for practical design purposes, even when performed on a large electronic computer. Several empirical models relating WHIM separator performance to design and operating parameters have been published. Because the amount of testwork required expands rapidly with the inclusion of each additional independent variable, empirical models are rarely developed to the degree of generality required for optimizing separator design. Since neither purely theoretical nor purely empirical models are well suited to design optimization procedures, a significant opportunity for advancing WHIM technology lies in the development of phenomenological models, which combine the most useful features of the theoretical and empirical approaches. Typically, in this compromise approach, theoretical analysis is used to derive or suggest reasonable, uncomplicated forms of the descriptive equations, but statistical curve-fitting techniques are used to find the parameters that fit the data to the equations. With the proper form of the descriptive equations, the required number of adjustable parameters and the testwork required to establish their values can be decreased to a minimum. The following example will illustrate the development and use of a simple phenomenological model.

Concurrently with a 5-day pilot plant test during which magnetic scavenging was tested, samples of the flotation tailings were evaluated in bench-scale WHIM separation tests under controlled conditions. Over the 5-day period, a 24 factorial experiment was run. The effect of daily variations in the tailings was assessed by conducting two midpoint tests each day. The variables and levels used in the tests are shown in table 1. The dependent variable of most interest, the fractional iron recovery, was shown to be independent of the iron content of the tailings, which varied from day to day. Equations developed by Oberteuffer and Watson suggested the following phenomenological equation:

The properties of the feed, such as its particle size distribution, did not vary significantly; therefore, the model was not complicated unnecessarily by including the effect of particle size on recovery. The feed characteristics have a strong effect on the parameter and a lesser effect on the other parameters.

To obtain accurate values of the parameters, weighting factors determined by the variance of the transformed dependent variable should be used in the regression calculation. It is of interest to compare equation 1 with the strictly empirical equation of Dobby and Finch, in which recovery is expressed as a linear function of the logarithms of the independent variables. Since the left-hand side of equation 2 can be closely approximated by the linear expression 3.2 R 2 for 0.2 < R < 0.9, as long as recovery is restricted to that range, there is no practical difference between the empirical and the phenomenological equations.

A well-conceived phenomenological equation should behave properly for limiting values of the independent parameters. Although equation 1 gives correct results for limiting values of H, L, and V, it incorrectly predicts R 1 as F 0. To correct this defect, equation 1 was modified to

A plot of experimental and calculated values of R versus the appropriate function of the independent variables is shown in figure 5. As can be seen from the range of the midpoint values of recovery, equation 3 adequately represents the data within the limits of experimental error. Although the fit could be improved by a more sophisticated model, the precision of the data probably does not warrant the introduction of the additional adjustable parameters that would be required.

The utility of a simple phenomenological equation as an aid in separator design can be illustrated by an example requiring only the simplest mathematical analysis. A feature of equation 3 that makes it particularly useful for design purposes is that matrix loading is defined per unit cross-sectional area rather than per unit volume. This formulation of the independent variables allows the effects of matrix length and matrix cross section to be evaluated independently and avoids the implication that the effect on metallurgical performance of loading per unit matrix volume is independent of matrix canister shape. For example, it is unlikely that, for a given mass of retained magnetics, canister A of 10-m cross-sectional area (fig. 6) has retained over its 1-meter length the same distribution of magnetics that canister B of 1-m cross-sectional area has retained over its 10-meter length. In terms of the design and operating parameters, the retention time of the slurry in the matrix is equal to L/V. For a given rate of slurry flow through the matrix canister, the retention time is determined by the canister volume. If recovery is controlled by retention time, the shape of Device B (fig. 6) would be operated at 10 times the flow velocity of A to give the same capacity and recovery. For retention time to be a valid design concept, the exponents nl, and nv in equation 3 must be nearly equal. For the magnetic scavenging results that have been discussed, the exponent nv was more than twice nL. Thus, for a given magnetized volume, configuration A, with a large cross-sectional area and small bed depth, gives optimal recovery. In fact, even if nL and nv were equal, configuration A would give better performance, because, for a given volume of feed slurry treated, matrix loading per unit area would be less. In principle, device B could be converted to give the same performance as A if the matrix were divided into 1-meter segments, as shown in C, and a suitable flow distribution system were provided.

Models developed from bench-scale tests are valuable for designing pilot- or full-scale WHIM separators only when the larger machines offer the same degree of control over operating parameters that laboratory units do. One important feature lacking in many continuous units is control over flow velocity by means other than the natural resistance of the matrix bed. The Bureau of Mines pilot plant experience has indicated several other important features of effective separator design. The applied magnetic field should be reasonably uniform across the cross section of matrix through which the feed slurry and rinse water flow. Adequate provision should be made for rinsing the matrix with clean water in the high magnetic field region. The nonmagnetic , rinse, and magnetic products should be effectively separated. The design should avoid areas where particles can settle out and accumulate, such as flat-bottomed sections, regions of stagnant flow, and high-gradient regions outside of the matrix.

Probably the most important problem encountered with pilot- or full-scale WHIM separators is permanent retention of particles in the matrix. The effects may range from a slight decrease in recovery to complete clogging of the system. The first step in attempting to eliminate this problem is matching the matrix to the feed. The matrix elements should be spaced widely enough not to capture large particles by purely physical means. So as not to adversely affect magnetic capture of fine particles by excessive spacing of the matrix elements, it is advantageous to adapt the feed to the matrix by removing the oversized particles. Permanent retention of ferromagnetic particles in the matrix can be minimized by reducing magnetic flux leakage into the matrix flush zone and by choosing a matrix material of low coercivity and remanence. If a large proportion of ferromagnetics is present in the feed, it is desirable to use a conventional low-intensity magnetic separator before high-intensity separation. A critical factor for maintaining a clean matrix is a flush water velocity much higher than that of the feed slurry. For a given quantity of flush water, pulsating flow is preferable to steady flow; back-flushing is preferable to forward flushing. One of the most effective methods of assuring a clean matrix bed is to provide a method of agitating and rearranging the matrix elements.

WHIM separation, either alone or in combination with flotation, is a technically feasible method of processing the enormous resources of oxidized taconite in the Lake Superior region. Commercial feasibility depends upon continuing progress in the design and construction of effective, reliable, yet economical magnetic separators. Mathematical models of separator operation can be valuable aids to the development of optimal designs. However, over dependence on unconfirmed theoretical descriptions, extrapolation of purely empirical results, and neglect of certain practical aspects of separator design can all lead to costly errors. Rational design of a full-scale separator for a particular application requires a realistic phenomenological model, supplemented by a systematic program of laboratory and pilot plant experimentation.

To help assure an adequate supply of minerals to meet the Nations economic and strategic needs, the Bureau of Mines is conducting bench- and pilot-scale research using wet high-intensity magnetic (WHIM) separation to recover iron from oxidized taconites of the Lake Superior region. The advantages and disadvantages of WHIM separation in relation to other separation methods, the most recent innovations in WHIM flowsheet design, and the role of mathematical models in process optimization are discussed.

magnetic separation

magnetic separation

Including wet high intensity, induced roll, rare earth roll, rare earth drum, low intensity and medium intensity magnetic separators the Reading range has a magnetic solution to fit your particular processing requirements.

The WHIMS range includes 4, 16, 24 and 48 pole machines with either 68 or 120 millimetre separation matrix widths. WHIMS separators are suitable for applications requiring higher magnetic field gradients to remove weakly magnetic particles from non-magnetic concentrates. Nominal capacities range from 6 to 150 tonnes per hour.

Reading induced roll and semi-lift induced roll magnetic separators are available with 2 starts, single or twin-pass configurations in 133 millimetre roll diameter and 760 millimetre roll width or 160 millimetre roll diameter and 1000 millimetre roll width, and deliver nominal capacities of up to 12 tonnes per hour. Pilot roll laboratory scale separators are available in both induced roll and semi-lift induced roll configurations.. Typical applications include:

The rare earth magnetic separator range achieves the most effective dry separation of paramagnetic minerals at high throughput rates. The range includes Rare Earth Roll (RERS) and Rare Earth Drum (REDS) Separators which are available in a range of configurations and sizes from lab units to full production units.

wet magnetic drum separator

wet magnetic drum separator

Low-intensity separators are used to treat ferromagnetic materials and some highly paramagnetic minerals.Minerals with ferromagnetic properties have high susceptibility at low applied field strengths and can therefore be concentrated in low intensity (<~0.3T) magnetic separators. For low-intensity drum separators used in the iron ore industry, the standard field, for a separator with ferrite-based magnets, is 0.12 T at a distance of 50 mm from the drum surface. Work has also shown that such separators have maximum field strengths on the drum surface of less than 0.3 T. The principal ferromagnetic mineral concentrated in mineral processing is magnetite (Fe3O4). although hematite (Fe2O3) and siderite Fe2CO3 can be roasted to produce magnetite and hence give good separation in low-intensity machines.

Permanent magnetic drum separators combine the attributes of a high-strength permanent magnetic field and a self-cleaning feature. These separators are effective in treating process streams containing a high percentage of magnetics and can produce a clean magnetic or non-magnetic product. The magnetic drum separator consists of a stationary, shaft-mounted magnetic circuit completely enclosed by a rotating drum. The magnetic circuit is typically comprised of several magnetic poles that span an arc of 120 degrees. When material is introduced to the revolving drum shell (concurrent at the 12 oclock position), the non-magnetic material discharges in a natural trajectory. The magnetic material is attracted to the drum shell by the magnetic circuit and is rotated out of the non-magnetic particle stream. The magnetic material discharges from the drum shell when it is rotated out of the magnetic field.

Permanent magnetic drum separators have undergone significant technological advancements in recent years. The magnetic circuit may consist of one of several designs depending on the application. Circuit design variations include:

The standard magnetic drum configuration consists of series of axial poles configured with an alternating polarity. This type of drum is simple in design and can be effective for low-intensity applications such as the recovery of ferrous metals and magnetite. This configuration typically does not provide a sufficient field strength or gradient for the recovery of paramagnetic minerals at high capacities. A typical axial circuit is shown in Figure 3.

The high-gradient element, as the name implies, is designed to produce a very high field gradient and subsequently a high attractive force. Several identical agitating magnetic poles comprise the element. The poles are placed together minimizing the intervening air gap to produce the high surface gradient. Due to the high gradient, the attractive force is strongest closer to the drum making it most effective when utilized with a relatively low material burden depth on the drum surface and, thus, a lower unit capacity. A high-gradient magnetic circuit is shown in Figure 4.

The interpole-style element utilizes a true bucking magnetic pole or interpole between each main pole. The magnetic field of the bucking element is configured to oppose both of the adjacent main poles resulting in a greater projection of the magnetic field. As a result, the interpole circuit allows for a relatively high material burden depth on the drum surface and thus higher unit capacity or improved separation efficiency. An interpole magnetic circuit configuration is shown in Figure 5.

A second interpole configuration consists of steel pole pieces placed between the magnetic poles. This is commonly termed a salient-pole element. The steel interpoles concentrate the magnetic flux providing a very high magnetic gradient at the drum surface. The magnetic field configuration is similar to the high- gradient type element but with an intensified surface gradient. This configuration offers the strongest field projection of any of the previously described circuits. The salient-pole circuit design is shown in Figure 6.

The magnetic elements described above are axial elements. The magnetic poles run across the width of the drum and are of alternating polarity. Magnetic elements are typically assembled with a minimum of five magnetic poles that span an arc of 110 degrees. (For all practical purposes, an arc of only 80 degrees is required to impart a separation. Non-magnetic particles usually leave the drum surface with a natural trajectory at a point of 60 to 70 degrees from top dead center dependent on the drum speed, particle size, and specific gravity.) The poles have alternating polarity to provide agitation to the magnetic components as they are transferred out of the stream of the non-magnetics. A magnetic particle will tend to rotate 180 degrees as it moves across each pole. This agitation is functional in releasing physically entrapped non-magnetics from the bed of magnetics. Agitating magnetic drums are most effective in collecting fine particles or where the feed contains a high magnetics content.

Dense-medium circuits have been installed in many mineral treatment plants since its original development about thirty years ago. In the intervening period the process has been thoroughly evaluated and many innovations have been introduced. The Heavy Density Cyclone is one of the newer systems which has extended the operating range of this process to 65 mesh size.

Medium recovery is obviously important since any loss is a direct cost against production. In coarse coal dense-medium plants a loss of 1 pound of magnetite per ton is usually acceptable but reduction to pound per ton as has been obtained in some plants.

Efficient cleaning maintains fluidity in the bath and increases sharpness of the coal-waste separation. Most dense-medium systems will tolerate some non-magnetic dilution of the bath but the magnetic separator must be capable of keeping this within workable limits, particularly on difficult coals. In some plants a partial bleed of the operating dense-medium bath is maintained through the magnetic separator to keep it clean.

Operating gravities of dense-medium coal plants are usually low enough so that a straight magnetite bath can be used. The return of a magnetic separator concentrate having 50% or more solids will maintain gravity without need for a thickening device. The use of a drum wiper has permitted the return of a 70% solids concentrate back to the separatory vessel. Operation at a high solids concentrate discharge is recommended since medium cleaning is improved. The colloidal slimes carried over with water are more completely rejected at high solids discharge.

Several types of magnetic separators have been used in magnetic medium recovery.The first magnetic drum separators were electro magnetic types but the development of efficient wet permanent drum separators has resulted in nearly universal acceptance of permanent drums in new plants.

The basic construction of each drum is the same. It consists of a stationary magnet assembly held in a fixed operating position by clamp bearings mounted on the separator support frame. An outer rotating cylinder driven through a sprocket bolted to one of the drum heads carries the magnetic material to the magnetic discharge point.

Normally, extreme cleanliness of the magnetic concentrate is not of prime importance in dense-medium plants but this can be a factor in some coals that separate with difficulty. The concurrent tank, reduced separator loading and in some instances dilution of the feed pulp will improve magnetic cleaning. Recleaning of a primary concentrate would improve cleaning but has not been used in commercial plants.

wet magnetic separation

wet magnetic separation

In essence, any magnetic separator operates on the basis of imparting a preferential magnetic force on particles of higher magnetic susceptibility which are to be separated from particles of lower magnetic susceptibility. A certain amount of directional deviation to the particles takes place thus allowing for collecting each category of particles separately.

In a separator operating on the principle of a vertically fed gap, those particles that pass through the central plane, or for that matter, the central zone, of the gap are subjected to zero or effectively near zero force of attraction all along their downward vertical path. Whereas, in case of a spheroidal medium, such zones, though of course do exist, are by no means continuous along the whole passage of the particle. They exist between each cluster of neighboring spheroids only.

iron elimination minerals super wet magnetic separator

iron elimination minerals super wet magnetic separator

Super Wet Magnetic Separator Of Minerals , Magnetic Bead Separation Operation process Super Wet Magnetic Separator Of Minerals , Magnetic Bead Separation For Ceramic Kaolin Slurry 1, power on ,then open the admission valve and slurry valve, close the back slurry valve and iron discharging valve, then magnetizing. 2, After a few minutes later(you can set the time what you like depending on yourself condition),close the admission valve and slurry valve, open the back slurry valve to discharge the remaining slurry in the separator, then magnetic cutting, close the admission valve, slurry valve and back slurry valve, open the iron discharging valve to discharge the magnetic material which are absorbed on the magnetic media. Product characteristic The magnetic field distribute evenly An obvious efficiency in iron remove. Applying water to cool the machine Enhanced the life span of the coil. Brake valve applying the import material. Technology parameter of contrast Model 1.5A160 3A89 3A190 7A250 7A300 11A250 20A400 Magnetic field strength(T) 2.5 2.5 2 3 3 3.5 3.5 Input voltage(ACV) 220 380 220 380 380 380 380 Maximumoutput current(DCA) 10 7 7 20 20 20 25 Maximum coil power(KW) 1.5 3 3 7 7 11 20 Insulation method E E E E E E E Cooling method water and oil double cooling water and oil double cooling water and oil double cooling water and oil double cooling water and oil double cooling water and oil double cooling Water and oil double cooling Magnetic lumen diameter(mm) 160 89 190 250 300 250 400 Pipe size (mm) 50 50 50 89 89 89 89 yield (m/h) 3-10 0.1-0.5 5-10 10-30 15-30 10-30 20-60 dimension (mm) 946(H) 500*500* 1000 860*860* 1540 1200*1200* 1850 1200*1200* 1850 1200*1200* 1850 1500*1500* 1850 Main machine weight (KG) 180 250 510 1050 1070 1210 3000 Usage Applicable for 40-400 mesh feedstock of iron elimination Application scope Electromagnetic slurry separators series :organicchemicalindustry and relatedequipment, Fine chemicals and related equipment,paper treatment ,paper pulp treatment,fiberstufftreatment,food treatment ,flavoring treatment ,grain and oil treatment,water treatmen ,Quartz Beneficiation,Sodium potassium feldspar Beneficiation,Kaolin Beneficiation.

2, After a few minutes later(you can set the time what you like depending on yourself condition),close the admission valve and slurry valve, open the back slurry valve to discharge the remaining slurry in the separator, then magnetic cutting, close the admission valve, slurry valve and back slurry valve, open the iron discharging valve to discharge the magnetic material which are absorbed on the magnetic media.

Electromagnetic slurry separators series :organicchemicalindustry and relatedequipment, Fine chemicals and related equipment,paper treatment ,paper pulp treatment,fiberstufftreatment,food treatment ,flavoring treatment ,grain and oil treatment,water treatmen ,Quartz Beneficiation,Sodium potassium feldspar Beneficiation,Kaolin Beneficiation.

energy saving oil cooling wet magnetic separator for kaolin ceramics slurry

energy saving oil cooling wet magnetic separator for kaolin ceramics slurry

Energy Saving Oil Cooling Wet Magnetic Separator For Kaolin Ceramics Slurry Automatic Efficient Electromagnetic Separator For Kaolin, Non-Metallic Mineral Ceramics Slurry With Energy Saving Product characteristic Automatic Oil-cooling Eletromagnetic Slurry Separator Series advantages : 1. High intensity magnetic field and more than 30% energy saving, greatly reduce operating cost; 2. Oil and Water dual medium cooling system designed to effecttively control The temperature of the machine rises slowly; 3. The magnetic field intensity are not easy to decrease when the machine run for a long time; 4. Long working period with very low falture rate ; 5. Have a wide range of adaption in the particle of feeding ore and the thickness of slurry; 6. High efficiency in mineral processing; 7.Inteelligent control, there is no need to more manual operation. Operation process 1. Firstly, power on, then open the admission valve and slurry valve, close the back slurry valve and iron discharging valve, then magnetizing. 2. After a few minutes later(you can set the time whatever you like depending on yourself condition),close the admission valve and slurry valve, open the back slurry valve to discharge the remaining slurry in the separator. 3. Then magnetic cutting, close the admission valve, slurry valve and back slurry valve, open the iron discharging valve to discharge the magnetic material which are absorbed on the magnetic media. Application scope Kaolin Beneficiation,Sodium potassium feldspar Beneficiation,Quartz Beneficiation. 1. Non-metallic mineral, Kaolin, Feldspar,quartz, or other industries Ceramics slurry, wastewater treatment. 2. Purification of Zirconium and titanium ore, effluent of power station disposal, disposal of contaminated chemical raw material. Technology parameter Model WS500-V WS750-V WS1000-V WY750-V WY1000-VB WY1200-V WY1500-V Magnetic field strength(T) 2 2.5 2.5 2 2 2.5 3 Input voltage(ACV) 380 380 380 380 380 380 380 Maximum coil power(KW) 75 103 150 82 120 150 180 Insulation method E E E E E E E Cooling method water cooling water cooling water cooling oil cooling oil cooling oil cooling oil cooling Magnetic lumen diameter(mm) 500 750 1000 750 1000 1200 1500 Pipe size(mm) 100 150 200 150 200 250 300 yield(m/h) 20-45 30-65 50-100 30-65 50-100 50-150 70-180 dimension(mm) 2328*1745* 2642 2659*1978* 2518 3052*2185* 2814 2958*2294* 3091 3503*2658* 3392 3950*2926* 3746 4349*3180* 3706 Main machine weight 14000 16600 26000 16000 28000 53000 65000 (KG) Usage Applicable for 40-400 mesh feedstock of iron elimination Clients processing pictures

Automatic Efficient Electromagnetic Separator For Kaolin, Non-Metallic Mineral Ceramics Slurry With Energy Saving Product characteristic Automatic Oil-cooling Eletromagnetic Slurry Separator Series advantages : 1. High intensity magnetic field and more than 30% energy saving, greatly reduce operating cost; 2. Oil and Water dual medium cooling system designed to effecttively control The temperature of the machine rises slowly; 3. The magnetic field intensity are not easy to decrease when the machine run for a long time; 4. Long working period with very low falture rate ; 5. Have a wide range of adaption in the particle of feeding ore and the thickness of slurry; 6. High efficiency in mineral processing; 7.Inteelligent control, there is no need to more manual operation. Operation process 1. Firstly, power on, then open the admission valve and slurry valve, close the back slurry valve and iron discharging valve, then magnetizing. 2. After a few minutes later(you can set the time whatever you like depending on yourself condition),close the admission valve and slurry valve, open the back slurry valve to discharge the remaining slurry in the separator. 3. Then magnetic cutting, close the admission valve, slurry valve and back slurry valve, open the iron discharging valve to discharge the magnetic material which are absorbed on the magnetic media. Application scope Kaolin Beneficiation,Sodium potassium feldspar Beneficiation,Quartz Beneficiation. 1. Non-metallic mineral, Kaolin, Feldspar,quartz, or other industries Ceramics slurry, wastewater treatment. 2. Purification of Zirconium and titanium ore, effluent of power station disposal, disposal of contaminated chemical raw material. Technology parameter

high performance mineral processing plant design practice and control

high performance mineral processing plant design practice and control

High Performance Mineral Processing Plant Design Practice And Control Mineral processing operators use equipment to process mineral ores until the final form or a concentrate is produced. Commonly processed minerals include gold, silver, nickel and iron ore. Mineral-bearing ore is subjected to various processes to extract the minerals. The ore is first crushed, then processing equipment (such as screens, grinding mills, filters, flotation cells, tanks and conveyors) is used to extract concentrated minerals. At the end of the treatment process the minerals may be produced into their final form by smelting, or as a bulk concentrate in preparation for shipment from site. Mineral processing operators may perform the following tasks: assemble and dismantle equipment and fittings in ore-processing plants operate ore-crushing and screening plants using manual and computer-based systems, conveyers, feeders, weight-meters, grinding mills, pumps, jigs, spirals and flotation cells load, unload and store materials such as treatment chemicals and tools mix ore-treating chemicals, catalysts and reagents supply and control molten metal in furnaces clear blockages in materials-handling and transporting equipment clean, wash and maintain equipment, and remove spillages and rubbish maintain auxiliary systems, such as drainage, fluid-pouring and conveyor-belt systems take samples of materials for testing use thickeners in the treatment processes, pump tailings and manage tailings dams and associated raw-water systems monitor the operation of plant and equipment and ensure the safety of other workers. Mineral processing operators can be involved in all aspects of mineral processing, including sampling and laboratory work. They often work in remote areas that are dusty, hot and noisy. Mineral processing operators work in teams, and shiftwork may be involved. Personal Requirements: enjoy practical and manual activities able to cope with the physical demands of the job resourceful safety-conscious mechanical aptitude. We Owns a complete set of small prototype mine beneficiation equipmnet. Provides free beneficiation test. If you have any ore, please post 15-20kg to our company for a free dressing experiment.Prepare for beneficiationtest records. And collates them into a complete beneficiation test report to you, for your reference.

Mineral processing operators use equipment to process mineral ores until the final form or a concentrate is produced. Commonly processed minerals include gold, silver, nickel and iron ore. Mineral-bearing ore is subjected to various processes to extract the minerals. The ore is first crushed, then processing equipment (such as screens, grinding mills, filters, flotation cells, tanks and conveyors) is used to extract concentrated minerals. At the end of the treatment process the minerals may be produced into their final form by smelting, or as a bulk concentrate in preparation for shipment from site.

Mineral processing operators can be involved in all aspects of mineral processing, including sampling and laboratory work. They often work in remote areas that are dusty, hot and noisy. Mineral processing operators work in teams, and shiftwork may be involved.

We Owns a complete set of small prototype mine beneficiation equipmnet. Provides free beneficiation test. If you have any ore, please post 15-20kg to our company for a free dressing experiment.Prepare for beneficiationtest records. And collates them into a complete beneficiation test report to you, for your reference.

Related News
  1. megnatic separation
  2. manufacturer of magnetic separator for manganese processing 2 india
  3. inertial separator dust collector
  4. magnetic separator wikipedia
  5. spiral classifiers for mineral separation
  6. single screw spiral classifier for gold ore separation
  7. high quality hydro cyclone classifier separation machine for non ferrous minerals
  8. spiral chute separator adalah
  9. magnetic 0png
  10. what is the core meaning of magnetic separation
  11. magnetic separation meaning in tamil
  12. hydraulic cone crusher 80's toy
  13. power consumed by crushers and grinders
  14. crushing chemitry industrial
  15. sand washer in action
  16. materials for cone crusher
  17. high quality medium river sand high efficiency concentrator sell in glasgow
  18. namibia efficient stone cone crusher
  19. iron ore beneficiation process ppt
  20. ghana wood pellet mill plans