gold processing equipment
With the rising price of gold and the limited amount of mineable land, people are now focusing onthe recovery of fine gold. Some rivers of the world have been sluiced as many as 6 times, yieldingprofitable gold each time and demonstrating that traditional sluices can have very poor recovery.
A Land Dredge is an effective way to break up and transport clay. Through the action in the impellor and turbulence within the hose, the land dredge is one of the most economical means of dispersing and transporting clay.
The IGR 500-2 is ideal to use in conjunction with a 6 land dredge. The 2 cyclones can process 800 gpm of slurry. The 2 i350 concentrators can process 20 tph of -2mm solids with surges to 30 tph. Land dredges and sluices normally have a very thin slurry. The cyclones are used to remove the excess water and provide an efficient slurry density to the concentrators.
The i350 Concentrator operates efficiently at 10 tph solids with a max of 15tph of 2mm The dual 5 HP feed pumps have a capacity of 90 m^3/hr (400 gpm) of water at 15dynamic head each, for a total of 180 m^3/hr (800 gpm) at 15 dynamic head.
gold mining equipment
911MPE hassmall gold mining equipment for sale andmore specifically mineral processing equipment. Our equipment is best used in small scale extractive metallurgyoperations operated by small miners or hobbyist prospectors and mining fanatics. 911MPE offers gold mining equipment as well as processing equipment applicable to most any base metals: copper, lead, zinc, nickel, tin, tungsten and more. For the relatively small size of equipment offered, sample preparation and metallurgical laboratories can economically buy good alternatives to the usually unaffordable equipment for sale in the classic market place.
911MPE has for target market what mining professionals consider the pilot-plant scale mining operation or artisanal mining operations with a focus around under 500TPD. Metals you can extract include: gold, silver or other of the precious group as well as the classic base metals; copper, lead, zinc, nickel, molybdenum. Much of our ultra-small scale equipment allows you to process from just a few kilo (pounds) per day and work on your passion for a small budget.
You can buy from us mineral processing equipment starting from crushing, grinding, classification, dredging, gravity separation, flotation, pumps, water treatment and smelting. A line of ovens, furnaces and laboratory equipment is also available.
Making a complete list of gold mining equipment starts with defining the type of gold mining you are doing and the budget you have at your disposal. The type of mining relates to hard rock,eluvial, or placer; alluvial deposits. The capital budget you have to invest in buying your equipment with dictate the scale at which you want to mine and influence the long-term operating costs of your mining operation.
Since most of the information online provides lists of gold mining equipment for amateur level mining with equipment like: gold pans, metal detectors, mini sluice box, blue bowl, geologist rock pick, soil scoop, hand screens/classifiers. The items listed just now fall closer to gold prospecting tools and equipment than actual mining.
I will present here what I consider are major equipment lists for 3 types of mining operations. Remember now, a metallurgist is writing. This will not be flawless and since my speciality is process equipment, that is mostly what will be discussed.
Some amateur level gold prospecting equipment such as metal detectors are often classified as mining equipment by small miners/prospectors operating as a hobby. These items include but are not limited to:
gold processing 101 - mining magazine
Amidst the general fall in metal prices over the last few years, the gold price has remained comparatively stable in the US$1,000-1,250/oz range. Gold bulls were disappointed that the price did not break through the $2,000/oz ceiling; nevertheless the current stable price run has helped to maintain a strong interest in gold projects.
The second is the sustained, and dare I say sustainable, use of cyanide for gold leaching in the last 100 years or more in a world of increasing environmental concerns and general aversion to the use of toxic chemical like cyanide. Alternatives to cyanide are not the subject of this article, but it is suffice to say that recent applications of alternatives to cyanide, e.g. thiosulfate at Goldstrike Nevada, have been driven by technical rather than environmental imperatives. In the case of Goldstrike, this was a double-refractory ore combining sulphide-occluded gold with preg-robbing carbonaceous material that rendered the ore unsuitable for conventional cyanide leaching and carbon adsorption.
In most cases, gold processing with cyanide leaching, usually with carbon adsorption, is still the core technology and the critical thing is understanding the mineralogy in order to optimise flowsheet selection and cost drivers, and get the best out of the process.
Traditionally, the process selection choice was between a conventional, well-tried, three-stage crushing circuit followed by ball milling, or single-stage crushing followed by a semi-autogenous (SAG) mill and ball mill. The latter is preferred for wet sticky ores to minimise transfer point chute blockages, and can offer savings in both capital costs and long-term operating and maintenance costs. However, the SAG route is more power-intensive and, for very hard ores, comes with some process risk in predicting performance.
Now that initial wear issues have largely been overcome, they offer significant advantages over a SAG mill route where power costs are high and the ore is very hard. They can be attractive too in a heap leach where the micro-cracking induced by the high pressure has been demonstrated in many cases to improve heap leach recovery.
The hashing stage (corresponding to metal extraction and recovery stages) is a little more complex for gold ores, as the optimal process flowsheet selection choice is heavily dependent on a good understanding of two fundamental geometallurgical parameters, the gold mineralogical associations, and the gold particle size and liberation characteristics. These are summarised in Table 2, where the processing options that correspond to the various combinations of mineral associations and liberation are shown along with some examples.
This is common in tropical environments (e.g. West Africa) and typically oxidises gold-bearing sulphides down to 50-100m, transforming commonly refractory gold in sulphides to free-milling gold, behaving in a similar fashion to gold associated with quartz.
Refractory ores are typically treated by flotation and the resulting flotation concentrate may be sold directly to a smelter (common for example in China) or subjected to downstream processing by pressure oxidation or bio-leach.
An ore containing 1% sulphur will produce a mass pull of approximately 5% by weight to a bulk flotation concentrate where recovery is the key driver. If this ore also contains 1g/t Au (for GSR =1), and 90% recovery to concentrate is achieved, then 0.90g will be recovered and with a concentration ratio of 20 (5% to concentrate) this corresponds to 18g/t Au in concentrate.
Both smelter treatment charges and oxidation or bio-leach costs are at least $200/t of concentrate and payables/recovery in the 90% range, so a minimum GSR for effective downstream processing is around 0.5. Clearly this is a function of gold price, but in the current gold price and cost environment, a good rule of thumb is that a minimum GSR of 0.5 is required for downstream processing of a gold-bearing concentrate.
A lower GSR can be tolerated if the flotation concentrate is amenable to direct cyanide leaching without the costly oxidation stage to release the gold from the sulphides. And on-site dor production avoids the off-site costs of transport and smelter charges, but usually with lower recovery (flotation recovery then oxidation-leach recovery) so a trade-off analysis is required.
Smelters typically pay >95% (Au) and 90% (Ag) in copper and lead concentrates, but will only pay 60-70% (maximum, depending on degree of Pb/Zn smelter integration) for gold and silver in zinc concentrates.
It can be seen that the key cost elements are: power, cyanide and grinding steel plus, for refractory ores, the costs associated with pressure oxidation or bio-leaching. It should also be noted that, where cyanide destruction is required (increasingly the norm), then cyanide detox unit costs are usually of a similar order of magnitude to the cyanide unit cost.
In summary, and of particular relevance to project screening, an early appreciation of gold mineralogical associations and liberation can provide considerable insight into metallurgical process flowsheet selection and processing costs.
Copyright 2000-2021 Aspermont Media Ltd. All rights reserved. Aspermont Media is a company registered in England and Wales. Company No. 08096447. VAT No. 136738101. Aspermont Media, WeWork, 1 Poultry, London, England, EC2R 8EJ.